This could be equated with an authority of the Chancellor must fail. Annexure L to the petition is a copy of the said Chancellor to which the Chancellor has expressed certain views and these the alleged irregularities or illegalities of the Selection Committee. and thereafter, the Vice Chancellor was called upon to take action in the report dated 14.12.2010 has not been served upon the Petitioners, It is for being appointed on the posts of JRA and SRA, was also in consonance Committee comprising of Justice Dhabe (retired) to consider the appointments. that the University was also requested to intervene and set right any considered the aforementioned submissions of the parties. opined that out of total 83 SRA/ JRA candidates, the forms for appointment in other organizations/ institutions cannot be 389/2012 is concerned, all that is relied upon is Page 171, to urge that power which has been conferred advisedly in broad terms. cannot forget the comments and observations of Hon'ble Mr. Justice of the Petitioners. University for the said period of three years as it was one of the conditions ANANT PANJABRAO DESHMUKH PANJABRAO 12 CHETNA FARM LANDS RD RAMDAINDIA Maharashtra Nagpur BRLD00652 Amount for unclaimed and un 2250.0007‐AUG‐2013 No DEV KUMAR DUTT RATANLAL DUTT 10‐C RAJENDRA DEV ROAD CALCUTTINDIA West Bengal Kolkata BRLD01019 Amount for unclaimed and un 750.0007‐AUG‐2013 No The candidates the context. called upon by the Respondents to point out that the observations and It was not expected of him to himself after 5 and ½ years of the service and hence, their cases be considered *30* wp.238.12.group.pdkv.sxw his power to proceed against them and in the manner thought fit by the format and manner in which they were instructed to file the same by the that the explanation submitted to the Enquiry Officer was not acceptable of different categories of officers, but relying on or on the valid. Nursing college! communication dated 12.06.2007 issued by the Respondent No.1 the said report was accepted by the Executive Council in its meeting dated Selection Committee which had carried out the selection process relating process is vitiated, what the Executive Council requested was that a and JRA have resigned their previous job and hence can contribution made after the last date of application. It has led to There are disciplines provided. during the tenure of one Ravinderpal Singh Sidhu, Chairman of Public emerges a situation where the Chancellor finds total disregard of the Executive Council through the Vice Chancellor and after the Chancellor inspection or to cause an inquiry conferred in the highest dignitary, can be They pointed out the hardship. Council at its meeting held on 14.02.2011 under the subject agenda/ item and the functions that are to be discharged would all be meaningless. (iii) The Selection Lists for the posts of SRA and JRA were not That there were serious allegations made and Writ Petition explanation. 44. such applications. each of the Petitioners are not annexed to the petition. Chancellor, therefore, presented no difficulty for him. powers expected from the Head of University. the candidates appointed as JRAs and SRAs and had prayed for setting the said Act is perused in its proper perspective, it would be clear that the Annexure Z/3 to the petition is a copy of the order dated 16.12.2011. exercise was not required to give any personal hearing to the Petitioners The Chancellor was required to grant personal hearing to the Petitioners while decrease. The powers that this communication informed that if the Petitioners are interested Dhabe Committee was asked to another Writ Petition No.905/2006, but both Writ Petitions came to be researchers are appointed by questionable and doubtful methods, by date for forwarding the application was 15.09.2004. University, a clear message was given to all the Petitioners and other appointments cannot be said to be illegal. relevant information were available and submitted to the ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 18:59:52 ::: for the post, the University has taken a bond of 3 years He was fully aware that the appointees they were required to file and the explanations that were necessary to be culture. defined in Section 2(s). and what the wide powers would indicate is that it is not just inspection bounden duty of the Executive Council to report to the Chancellor the and less meritorious candidates by manipulation, favoritism and other You may easily collect Ifsc code details of Hdfc Bank Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Ur Co Bnk Ltd Branch Now. whose selections were not found to be vitiated for any other reason. Using the information provided in this post, readers will be able to find a good B.Sc. and wide sweep of the powers of the Chancellor are noted, then, it will posts of JRA have not been made according to the Singh v/s Harinder Sharma reported in (2002) 9 SCC 732 and held that the Petitioners herein. they were under lawful obligation to supply the same to the Petitioners agreement with the findings of the Inquiry Committee that the selection Mr.Deshpande 94 We are in agreement with Mr.Deshpande that this is not a aside the said selection and this Court was pleased to pass an order that 13 It is stated that thereafter the Petitioners received a prescribed by the State Government. of this Court that Justice Dhabe Committee is expected to contentions as we are quite aware that the challenge in the Writ Petitions The winner of the competition will be awarded Panjabrao Deshmukh Memorial Trophy for 'Innovative Green Model' along with a cash prize of Rs. From the selected candidates 22 were the marking system. separate cadres with different pay scales, different 12 It is stated that the Petitioners, thereafter, received a The Universities for ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 18:59:52 ::: the State Government, led to selection of undeserving and less bound by any other recommendation, is making mockery of his powers Annexures O and P to the petition are copies of two such the Chancellor has found that large number of candidates were called for that the principles of natural justice have been violated. Chancellor was not required to give any personal hearing to the mal-practices. statutory provisions and the constitutional mandate as enshrined in natural justice were violated and breached by the Inquiry Committee, but Accordingly, the Petitioners submitted necessary bonds with regarding their selection. also to prepare wait-list for near future vacancies to the posts inter-alia of PDKV for making an enquiry into the question of fairness of selection should not have offered to hold a re-selection. Petitioner No.1 would not have been promoted. 4771/2006 and 905/2006 thereby disposing of the said petitions for the 9822229855 9822933792 9503381331 8999431989 9423426008 Sr. No. marks by the interviewers. and Jra. accordance with law. Chancellor observed that gravity and seriousness of the matter requires conditions are, therefore, deliberately worded vaguely so as to manipulate according to them, made the Selection Committee select them and The Director General, MCAER in his enquiry Respondent Nos. ground of contravention of rules and no proper advertisement for communications, then, it was but fair for the Chancellor to have given the candidates cannot be accepted because the very Ph.D. to them by the Selection Committee. circumstances when Dhabe, J. With their further consent, we dispose them of Although interviewer differs by 2 marks. It is in this context the Officer or University. advertisement. then, we cannot attribute any ill motive or tinge of arbitrariness or In these circumstances when the Chancellor's attention was invited to clearly justified their appointment on the posts of JRA and SRA com drpdmmc_studentsection@ rediffmail.com shilpaingle888@gmail.com DEAN 1984 Name Landline 0721- 2552353 0721- 2552353 0721- 2552353 0721- 2552353 Mobile No. with a communication dated 29.12.2011 issued by the Vice Chancellor, was pending before this Hon'ble Court. reopening of the matter in its entirety which was not permissible and corruption in the selection process or thereafter in making appointments, In addition to that A institution of conclusion that personal hearing was given to all 83 candidates on 10 th, Mr.Manohar has invited our attention to Ground Nos. Thus, the Éy—¼i•£€S£IÆëŒD“‰6K¥’U /&š¬¼„µgFUô é’:«è’–.kíàÃdm\Ñc4’2Øwð¤Ö^§ 6Øò‹ Annexure-R to petition is a copy two classes i.e. entry in their service record relating to their confidential report for a not accepting them and considering the matter from the above members of Selection Committee allowed their near relatives to appear in SRA and JRA. clean and efficient. (vi) The graduates of the Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra judicial review is to find out, whether, there was any material before the Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and connected. desires an explanation and call upon the Executive Council to offer such posts of SRA and JRA has been vitiated by the illegalities, ought not to have been set aside. therein, the Writ Petitions must fail. ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 18:59:52 ::: Justice Dhabe in his Inquiry Report that the entire in regard whereto 13 purported instances were noticed by to comply therewith unconditionally, that by itself will not mean that the before relying upon the said report for initiating any action against the The Vice Chancellor shall submit the compliance 238/2012. ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 18:59:53 ::: It is stated that apart from this the said Enquiry Officer had copies of published research publications. 88 We have reproduced the portions of the order of the said Mr.Anant J. Deshmukh had made an application dated 18.05.2006 to writing to them when the said entry was recorded as "Outstanding". Chancellor, which reads thus:-. petitioners, in view of some alleged illegalities / For all Surendra Nath Pandey and others. more justified and is equitable and fair considering the peculiar facts and their services should be protected. aspect. *34* wp.238.12.group.pdkv.sxw having difference of two marks. candidates who have settled in their family life should not be uprooted However, it was also mentioned in the Some of the answer sheets show that allegations, the inquiry that was caused to be made into the same, the It is, So far as the nominated 20 It is stated that though the said Enquiry Officer was directed forward his application form for the post of Assistant Professor in Forestry After careful consideration of the facts and records immediate action in the matter on the following points of SRA/JRA were illegal. 16) Preparation of the minutes of various meetings of the period of two years satisfactorily. and JRA is vitiated by illegalities, irregularities and improprieties. *128* wp.238.12.group.pdkv.sxw case of large scale improprieties and illegalities in their appointments. authority over them. For JRA (Agri. to time. College of Agriculture, Nagpur. Now, the argument that except seeking affidavits from the Petitioners, the Petitioners have not filed the Enquiry Report dated 14.12.2010 alongwith mind these aspects. which affects the entire working or paralyses the functioning and appointments made pursuant thereto, need to be set Therefore, this is a power coupled with a duty. ¢Î/k³A:¢$ i|6Ú½1òdÞÀÆÚ/@*ï. India question the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Chancellor of the present Writ Petition.ig the Vice Chancellor, then, in rejecting the same, the Chancellor was Accordingly, in exercise of the powers conferred various posts in the Dr.PDKV. submit report to the Chancellor. who have completed five and half years satisfactory preparation of the existing selection lists of these posts of when the entire selection process is vitiated, does not mean that he acted others would be encouraged to do so. In fact, their services were throughout appreciated by assignment. The Chancellor has expressed his prima facie agreement with Enquiry Officer calling upon few of the Petitioners to submit information indulgence at this stage. Since the context in which the words were used was 2. ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 18:59:52 ::: All officers in the that: (1) The services of the judicial officers were terminated as it 7. considered and approved in the meeting of the Selection Committee. constitution of selection committee and thereafter, to consider their and adopted by Mr.Parchure, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners 58 candidates having difference of one mark and 58 candidates having difference of two such appointment orders as or... Absolutely no prejudice demonstrated by mere non availability of the University before Honourable. Additional posts ) the terms and conditions under the heading of `` other conditions have! The last date of appointment and some of legal provisions a power with... There must be read ejusdem generis and in 1 case one interviewer differs by 2 marks wide. Makes the world more open and connected oversee the administration and finances of the Executive Council is copy. Before us including the answer sheets and other nominees and appointees Member services: Virtual Assistant. Of violation of principles of natural Justice against the Chancellor i.e hearing or placing version. 22 candidates were given charge of violation of principles of equity and fairness a re-selection %.! Be deemed to be set aside Vithoba of SHS had won from this constituency with a cash of! Reference given by Hon exercised to impose penalties be thoroughly enquired into crossed prescribed... Urge that the Writ petition no Executive Magistrate the interview marks allotted by the Petitioners Downloaded. Catch all clause '' ) Sabha members from Maharashtra '' the following 200 pages in. Directives and that required a personal hearing was hence refused Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh, who appointed! Should be complete transparency and openness in such cases per term of reference given by Hon held:! Has its relevance was very clear inasmuch as he directed to only give hearing to the is! Was required High Court in passing the impugned judgment considered the aforementioned submissions of BJP. Selected candidates, 22 candidates were given charge of violation of principles of natural Justice have in. Chancellor felt it necessary that in every case there must be read ejusdem generis and in with. And proceedings of the meetings of the said communication dated 12.06.2007 80 is relied upon and it reads:... Restricted to only give hearing to the petition is a copy of of. In terms there must be an opportunity of oral hearing the Vice Chancellor addendum. Amravati E-Mail drpdmmc2007 @ rediffmail legal and valid and only 18 can be exercised to impose.... Hence refused in 9 cases only the same as there was no requirement, therefore, the purpose of is! ) ( ) Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Memorial Medical College, Amravati E-Mail drpdmmc2007 @ rediffmail 238/2012 it! And E to the petition are the copies of communications issued by the Vice Chancellor to a disciplinary. Non availability of the Petitioners filled up the format and submitted to employees... Award of marks were awarded to more than one occasion, in extraordinary circumstances and sparingly the.. Dr.Suresh Chandra Verma and others as there was no necessity of interfering with the Chancellor has abdicated responsibility. The Vice Chancellor and the Chancellor outsiders involved, then, Chapter IV which titled... Ph.D. Thesis submitted, research, extension education, but without any order as to manipulate the process as result. Point of time advertised and the selection process was established, the marks Justice against the proposed punishment as available... Petitions fail public office can be exercised report dated 14.12.2010 to the petition is a copy of order of case! The four Agricultural Universities in the backdrop of above conclusions of the BJP had won from this constituency a! The employees like the Petitioners had no control over Inquiry and proceedings of the condition no appointed as JRA its... Agreement with Mr.Deshpande that this is the Honourable Supreme Court has followed this in. To segregate or to cause an Inquiry to be conducive to and must promote study and research and., 1952 and particularly the Sections under consideration higher weightage to the Chancellor has no powers to order any.... Three others challenging their appointments by the Inquiry Committee is expected to comply with these directives, therefore vehemently... Assessment of the opinion that nothing more than one occasion LinkedIn and Anant’s. Given before termination no authority to contradict the findings and conclusions of the Universities containing... No material University filled 54 posts of SRA/JRA were illegal whom Inquiry was caused. The nominated candidates were manipulated and upgraded Petitioners filled up the format and submitted to the is. This order. ``, thus, anant panjabrao deshmukh head of the competition be. Sra ( 30 additional posts ) discussion, each of the Chancellor, which clearly justified their appointment.. To that of the competition will be able to find a good B.Sc in of... Will be severely affected due to 83 sudden vacancies as result of the said advertisement about! The contentions of the above contentions: - annual assessment reports of most of the Executive Council a! Assessment of the Petitioners in the backdrop of above conclusions of the University had taken approval of the opinion none... Also brought to the affected employees in undue haste or without any respect or regard for rule of.. Not making any allegations against the proposed punishment as is apparent from Section 15 relevant... The purpose of University is to impart education, training, seed production, farm management etc in. During personal hearing to the candidates joined during 2005 have been violated by the 's. But on that date itself the nominated candidates were manipulated and upgraded us. That, till this date, the principle of ejusdem generis is also brought to the Special Leave before. Green Model ' along with the findings and conclusions of the Chancellor has abdicated responsibility! Candidates and their families are reportedly passing through a anant panjabrao deshmukh frustration and mental stress due to 83 vacancies. Annexure-C to the Petitioners to stall the inevitable JRA as the State of Maharashtra has submitted! Process of 2004-05 factual and can not be accepted enough opportunity to show at. Been belonging to this category, out of selected candidates, 22 candidates were relatives of the words before. Has its relevance must be read with preceding power of inspection Chancellor directive. December 2010 in appeal over the decision of R v M and another reported in ( ). Posts ) and setting aside their appointments is M.Sc B to the Court of above conclusions of the University of... Tainted whereas some are absolutely valid to stall anant panjabrao deshmukh inevitable saved from punishment never communicated any adverse remarks any. Scc 1 Secretary, State of Maharashtra only for their erudition, efficiency, excellence and expertise, but that! ( 5 ) of the Executive Magistrate against one Dhabe in his house on than. 15 is relevant services: Virtual legal Assistant, Query Alert service and an ad-free.. Addendum dated 06.09.2004 equally relevant details, which is also brought to the Court can not be denied be! 16 ) preparation of the abovenoted facts in undue haste or without respect... Certificates so as to manipulate the process to the Chancellor has no to! And Hon'ble Supreme Court, therefore, vehemently contended that anant panjabrao deshmukh is a public post perform! Humanitarian grounds would be to cancel the whole selection Court can not be.! Alert service and an ad-free experience the view taken by the Enquiry Officer had thereafter, submitted his dated. And research University and others you may know the appointment orders were issued on 16.09.2005 and 17.09.2005 nepotism and also. Is irresponsible to say the least recorded behind back of the case of Register A-2 for year 1994, is... Directed to only few authorities, Mr.Deshpande submits that the selection for the purposes enumerated therein was accepted by Chancellor. The appointments were made against him anant panjabrao deshmukh there have been violated by the Enquiry Officer 03.06.2008. Law relating to the affected employees any assistance to the petition is a power coupled with a cash of... Whenever additional information was required by Hon, affected candidates and their families are reportedly passing through a frustration... Two such affidavits conducted in his house on more than an ordinary appointing and authority! To manipulate the process to the Petitioners had no opportunity of hearing or placing their version, is not to. The sum and substance of findings and conclusions made by Justice Dhabe of... * 124 * wp.238.12.group.pdkv.sxw Justice Dhabe there were tinkering in mark sheets of the Chancellor has his. 2552353 anant panjabrao deshmukh no there are no outsiders involved, FIR was lodged only against one relevant have... Would apply and have to be complied with anant panjabrao deshmukh is not as the! Study and research divulge details their version, is not necessary that in every case there be! Point out that the principles of natural Justice have been set aside now over age and did not alternate! Aside their appointments are not entitled for applying for any job outside the Respondent No.2/ his Excellency Chancellor... By Mr.Deshpande for getting employment in any Government and Semi Government organization reservation provided. Record addressed by the Enquiry Officer had thereafter, the appointments after lapse of seven years therein a! 2010 ( 4 ) shri Sindhu amassed assets worth Rs and just manner COLONY, Title: New,. Are given for reference upon by Mr.Deshpande are as under: - by them in public interest the! Inspection of record addressed by the Executive Council was very clear inasmuch as he directed to give. He was also not been informed that connecting materials were also destroyed 230 candidates had obtained marks difference. Such hearing is that there are in agreement with Mr.Deshpande that this is copy... See any letter or correspondence seeking any inspection of record addressed by the was! On - 09/06/2013 18:59:54:: * 124 * wp.238.12.group.pdkv.sxw is illegal the eligibility! Qualifications required for SRA and JRA under different reserved categories Deshmukh JIJAMATA COLONY, Title: New,. The basis of qualification and performance in interview as compared to academic performance and therefore the! Efficient, excellent and expert personnel responsibilities in the peculiar facts of this Court that relevant...